How Quantum Physics Shapes Our Understanding of Relationships
Written on
Chapter 1: The Quantum Connection in Relationships
Recently, I had a conversation with my friend, who we'll call Karl, about a girl he admires, whom we'll refer to as Amie. Karl has been reluctant to express his feelings for her, worried about how she might respond. They've maintained a friendship, but Karl realized it wasn't enough for him and has started to distance himself. Despite our repeated discussions on this topic, my attempts to encourage him to contact her have consistently faltered. This time, I approached the matter differently:
— Don't you see? At this moment, her feelings for you are in a state of superposition. Once you gauge her feelings, only one option will remain. But be mindful; your observations will ultimately influence the outcomes.
Unfortunately, my explanation flew over his head. I then tried to simplify it, stating that she likely has mixed feelings about him and that a meeting would clarify everything. However, I emphasized that his demeanor would shape her response. Without taking action, he would continue to wonder and potentially miss out on a chance. If he had grasped the concept of superposition, he might have understood my point more clearly.
Although I lack formal training in physics or any scientific discipline, I am an avid enthusiast of quantum physics. This fascination inspires much of my writing. Since delving into this intriguing scientific realm, I've begun to perceive life through the principles of the universe. One such principle involves the idea of particles existing in a state of superposition. The more I contemplate this, the more I see its relevance to various aspects of my life.
What Exactly is Quantum Superposition?
Quantum superposition refers to the state of a particle before it is measured. It suggests that a particle can exist in multiple states simultaneously. However, once a measurement is taken, it collapses into one specific state. Even more intriguingly, if another measurement occurs later, the particle retains the potential to occupy any of its possible states. To illustrate, think of tossing a coin; until you look at it, you cannot determine whether it is heads or tails. Each time it is flipped, it has an equal probability of being either outcome. The distinction with particles is that when they are unobserved, they exist in all states at once, unlike the coin, which you know must be either heads or tails.
Photo by LongX Music on Unsplash
How Micro Influences Macro
There was a time when scientists chose to ignore their findings in quantum mechanics, believing that classical physics governed larger systems. This changed with Erwin Schrödinger's famous thought experiment involving cats in boxes. Schrödinger aimed to demonstrate how the micro world influences the macro environment.
In this experiment, a cat is placed in a box with a poison linked to a quantum event. Depending on whether an atom decays, the cat either lives or dies. Until the box is opened and the state is measured, the atom exists in superposition—both decayed and un-decayed, making the cat both alive and dead. This scenario mirrors the uncertainty in Karl's situation with Amie.
Today, we don't need such thought experiments to recognize the relevance of quantum physics; it's embedded in our technology, from smartphones to appliances. I believe that our relationships reflect the behaviors of particles and our interactions with them. And if the concept of the dead-and-alive cat is unsettling, the implications get even more intriguing.
The Observer Effect
As I mentioned, measuring a particle does not permanently assign it a state. If another observer examines the same particle, they might observe entirely different results. This phenomenon is known as the observer effect, indicating that the observer is an integral part of the experiment. Niels Bohr, a pioneer of quantum physics, famously stated:
"What predictions we base on [observational] findings depend on the way we pose our experimental question, and here the observer has freedom of choice… It is no longer possible to make predictions without reference to the observer or the means of observation."
Returning to my friend...
As I began to apply these concepts to my daily life, they initially seemed strange but quickly became apparent. Picture Karl as the observer and Amie as the particle, her feelings towards him being uncertain. She might not even be aware of her emotions, reflecting a more theoretical idea that the universe is inherently unpredictable. The outcome is determined at the moment of observation.
When Karl decides to reach out, he will gain insight into Amie's feelings. His approach—whether timid and uncertain or confident—will shape her response. Recognizing this connection to the laws of physics heightens awareness of how our actions impact reality. This isn’t mere speculation; it's a compelling perspective.
Chapter 2: Exploring Quantum Relationships
In this video, Sky Nelson Isaacs discusses the intricate relationship between quantum physics and the concept of synchronicity, providing deeper insights into how our interactions may mirror quantum behavior.
This video delves into various interpretations of quantum mechanics, explaining how these theories can influence our understanding of relationships and reality.