Why Academic Writing Lacks Flavor and Lessons Learned
Written on
Understanding the Boredom of Academic Writing
During my high school years, I was not a fan of academic writing—a style that many students grapple with. I still recall the discomfort of my fingers tingling from typing and my shoulders aching from hunching over, all in a race against the clock to meet essay deadlines.
Those late nights were eerily quiet, except for the sound of my furious typing and the hum of the computer fan. For me, the joy of writing primarily stems from pleasure, making the rigid structure of academic writing feel like a departure from that joy. Although I conduct thorough research for every piece I write, I find the strict citation formats particularly off-putting.
The most challenging aspect is the reading; I often feel compelled to digest material I find uninteresting and then articulate it in lengthy essays. This struggle led me to question why academic writing tends to be so monotonous and difficult to engage with. My inquiries took me down unexpected paths, revealing key insights for crafting impactful writing—insights that academic texts, and even AI-generated content, frequently overlook.
The Dilemma of Academic Writing
The early 20th century was marked by significant breakthroughs, such as Einstein’s theory of relativity and the Wright brothers’ pioneering flights. This era also saw the rise of academia, with universities becoming the epicenters for research amidst rapid advancements in various fields.
However, alongside this progress emerged an academic rat race that continues to affect the landscape today. In the 1940s, sociologist Logan Wilson introduced the phrase "Publish or Perish" to encapsulate the intense pressure academics faced to frequently publish their research.
We often hear the adage "quantity over quality," a cautionary tale for new writers, and it applies here for good reason: scholars who publish infrequently may find themselves struggling for job placements or research funding. As a result, researchers sometimes compromise on the quality of their work to meet publication demands.
While peer review is often seen as a beneficial quality control measure for academic publications, it can inadvertently perpetuate the problem. According to a study from the National Library of Medicine, peer review serves more as a "powerful method to demonstrate academic talent to peers." Thus, some academics prioritize impressing their colleagues over making their work accessible and impactful for a broader audience.
As Joshua Rothman noted in The New Yorker, this leads to writing that is "dry but also clever," where the "deepest ambiguity has to do with the audience."
Engaging Readers in Academic Conversations
One valuable lesson I’ve gleaned from academic writing is this: every subject can be distilled into a fundamental conversation. When you write about a topic, you essentially declare it’s your turn to share your perspective.
The challenge lies in inviting readers into this conversation and keeping them engaged. Ironically, academia often struggles with this, as it is fundamentally a dialogue among highly knowledgeable experts who vie to be the most intelligent voices at the table.
It can feel daunting to speak up in a room full of such intellect, leading many to withdraw from the conversation—or, in this case, from your articles.
Making Your Writing a Collaborative Experience
Words should be seen as a dialogue between you and your audience, not merely static symbols on a page. You can create a dynamic conversation in your writing by incorporating quotes and data from reliable sources.
However, you may not know much about your readers. To them, you might still be a stranger they trust to guide them through your narrative. Therefore, adopting a friendly tone with a judicious use of jargon is wise. Avoid the temptation to appear overly intelligent or enigmatic; instead, aim to be approachable through personal anecdotes that resonate before and during your narrative.
Gradually, your readers will feel part of a shared experience, even when confronted with unfamiliar concepts. This engagement can inspire them to contribute to the dialogue—whether through comments or their own writing.
This is what I consider effective inspiration, something to take pride in as a writer. So, don’t embark on this journey alone; invite others to join you and treat them as valued companions.
Chapter 2: Insights from Experts
Why is Academic Writing so Boring? - In this video, the presenter delves into the pitfalls of academic writing that often leave readers disinterested and disengaged.
Steven Pinker: Why Do Academics Write So Poorly? - In this insightful talk, Pinker discusses the reasons behind the lackluster quality of academic writing and what can be done to improve it.